On May 10, 2011, the American Folk Art Museum — that beloved, bedeviled museum on West 53rd Street — confirmed what many of us had feared for years. Facing a crippling debt and low attendance, the museum (or rather, its board of directors) has decided to sell the museum building and relocate to a lobby space one-sixth of its current size near Lincoln Center. Sad as it is to say, this news comes as no surprise, and the culprit is the museum’s physical home.
Despite the many rave reviews the 30,000-square-foot building received when it opened in December 2001, it was immediately clear to many that the building was not only ugly and confining, it was also all but useless for showing art — especially art as visionary as this museum’s. In the past decade, AFAM has mounted shows of some of the greatest artists of the 20th century, including Martin Ramirez, Henry Darger, Adolf Wolfli and Thomas Chambers. Yet, from the outside the building looked like a bronzed Kleenex box or a miniature suburban professional building. The inside was worse. Dominated by showy staircases of many scales going in different directions, and ill-conceived nooks and niches, the galleries were long narrow corridors or landings, sometimes only a few feet wide, making it impossible to see the art. The largest exhibition spaces had the look of a gloomy cloakroom.
The architects responsible for this utter lack of imagination and hubristic mess of starchitectural vanity, Tod Williams and Billie Tsien, were praised for their intelligent use of materials. The building was called astonishing, a shrine, a temple, a Zen masterpiece. In reality, every one of their decisions reflected a total lack of feeling for art, even a disdain for it. Before he died, the New York Timesarchitectural critic Herbert Muschamp, who’d said nice things about the building when it opened, confided to me that my loathing was “probably right.”
This terrible building will be sold to MoMA for an undisclosed sum (presumably at least $32 million the amount of the AFAM’s bond debt). I can only imagine that MoMA will use the building for office space — perhaps freeing up much-needed room for its own sorely cramped permanent collection — or tear it down and start again.
We may be at the beginning of a long period of undoing, of rebuilding or destroying architectural failures. In the years to come, those who oversaw and built many new museums and museum wings will have much to answer for. During a period when the West accumulated more wealth than at any time in the history of the world, a vast amount of ill-conceived space for art was constructed, as institutions wasted their energy on atriums and useless entertainment areas. Books and dissertations will be written, panels will be convened, ridicule will be heaped, as our descendants look back at these atrocious buildings and wonder how so much went so wrong. The American Folk Art Museum will probably be the first to be razed, and not the last.
it reminds one of one of picasso’s cubist violin/guitar paintings or a straitened out frank gehry effort, I like it…and as for ugly…
I had the privilege to work on that site years back when at SOM NY. The site was intrinsically unsuited for a successful gallery space – deep, dark, narrow and slated to being bookended by much taller structures in a not (then) too distant future. We lunged into designing the space, knowing our efforts were truly doomed from the start. With little chance for light to ever hit spaces where most needed, we resorted to all types of architectural gymnastics known to be financially prohibitive at the time – clearly in a desperate and futile attempt to accommodate the program. After months of working on it as part of a much bigger development (office tower above it), we concluded what now has become painfully obvious to all – the space should have never been considered for this use.
Although we know little of what truly transpired behind close doors and between the architects and the museum board of directors, I feel it is fair to assume that conversations regarding the unsuitability of that space must have taken place at least once – I think that part of the credit for this unfortunate debacle should fall on the museum’s leadership for their lack of vision.
Take away some grand, homely space for good folk art and redistribute with mindless, non – visionary, bland, metallic, insular crap. Shameful, and endemic of are banal world we live in today. I hope it disgracefully collapses along with its terrible, blot – on the landscape, ugly features. TIMBER!!!
Non è necessario vendere il museo per ripianare i debiti, è una scelta troppo semplice.
Non entro nel merito della location o della qualità architettonica ,dimensionale, e della scarsa partecipazione, pur avendone una specifica competenza.
Ritengo si debbano esaminare globalmente le potenzialità inespresse e attuare modelli di risanamento mediante applicazioni anche “visionarie” di rigida economia sostenibile.
La cessione al MoMa per la realizzare di uffici è semplicemente un trasferimento del problema .
La crisi globale, non solo americana, dei bilanci dei musei ( MoMa compreso ?) o degli spazi d’arte, delle Gallerie va affrontata attuando progetti fortemente innovativi con serenità e determinazione, bandendo la speculazione, idee economiche effimere e lavorando tenacemente.
Sto studiando quanto è in accaduto ed ho ho elaborato un Progetto che potrebbero, in una ottica di Sistema, cercare di risolvere alla radice gli attuali problemi e delineare concretamente nuove strade da percorrere per lo sviluppo.